Leo+DadMade for Leo
Application of Models
Rung 2 of 3 · The model

Running the Modelling Cycle

You've seen a model predict and get checked. Now let's turn that into a loop you can run on purpose — build, predict, test, refine, predict again — to make any model better.


Play Drag the trend line through the real data points. Watch the “miss” score drop as the fit improves, then use the line to predict a new point.
🎧
Audio WalkthroughComing Soon
Video ExplainerComing Soon

Scientists almost never get a model right on the first go. What they do instead is run a cycle: build a rough model, use it to predict, test the prediction against data, refine the model so it fits better, then predict again. Round and round, getting closer each lap.

The Modelling Cycle, in Five Moves

One — build a model. Start with a simple guess at the pattern. A straight line through the data is the classic one.

Two — predict. Use your model to call a result: for this input, the line says that output.

Three — test against data. Compare the prediction to the real measurements. How far off is it?

Four — refine. Adjust the model to shrink the gap — shift the line, change its slope — until it hugs the data better.

Five — predict again. Now use the improved model on a fresh case, and check it once more.

Say it plainly: don't aim for a perfect model — aim for one that fits the data well enough to be useful, then keep refining it. Good fit on the data you have = a prediction you can lean on for similar situations.

The Key Idea: Fit Means Trust

Here's the rule that makes this worth doing. A model that matches the data you already have is trustworthy for situations like it. If your line passes neatly through ten measured points, you can reasonably believe it for an eleventh point sitting right among them. The better the fit, the more confident your prediction — as long as you stay in the territory you measured. Stray too far outside it and things get sneaky — that's the whole of the next rung.

A Worked One, Slowly

Say you've measured how far a toy car rolls for five different ramp heights, and you want to predict the roll for a ramp you haven't tried. You build a straight line through your five points — that's your model. You predict: read off where the line sits at the new ramp height. You test by checking how snugly the line already sits among the five real points; if one point is miles off the line, your fit is poor and the prediction is shaky. So you refine — tilt and shift the line until the total miss is as small as you can make it. Now you predict again for the new ramp, and this time you can trust it, because the model has earned that trust on the data you do have. Build, predict, test, refine, predict — same loop every time.

Us, Thinking Out Loud

Could you run the five-step cycle back to me without peeking?

Why does a tighter fit on the measured points make you more confident about a new one nearby?